An Economic analysis of auto compensation system : choice experiences from New Jersey and Pennsylvania
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
<record>
<leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
<controlfield tag="001">MAP20071505393</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="005">20080418124625.0</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="008">040607e20031201usa|||| | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
<datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
<subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">322</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080147693</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Schmit, Joan T.</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
<subfield code="a">An Economic analysis of auto compensation system</subfield>
<subfield code="b">: choice experiences from New Jersey and Pennsylvania</subfield>
<subfield code="c">Joan T.Schmit, Jia-Hsing Yeh</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="520" ind1="8" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Nearly since the first automobile traveled on U.S. soil, questions about how best to compensate people injured by their use have been raised. Despute various efforts to identify and implement improved systems during the past more the 70 years, no clear best compensation mechanism has been found. Current discussions has focused on the "choice" system, under which insureds are allowed to select either a tort system or a no-fault system of compensantion at the time of insurance purchase. New Jersey and Pennsylvania, which implemented very similar choice programs in 1989 and 1990, respectvely, offer an opportunity to observe the effects of choice on outcomes such as: use of attorneys , speed of payment, and consistency (equity) of payment</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080603779</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Seguro de automóviles</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080572396</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Indemnizaciones</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080547127</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Estudios</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080568863</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Estados Unidos</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080583538</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Análisis económico</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080120191</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Yeh, Jia-Hsing</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="740" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">The Journal of risk and insurance</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="w">MAP20077000727</subfield>
<subfield code="t">The Journal of risk and insurance</subfield>
<subfield code="d">Orlando</subfield>
<subfield code="g">Volume 70, number 4, December 2003 ; p. 601-628</subfield>
</datafield>
</record>
</collection>