Why (Re)insurance is not systemic
Contenido multimedia no disponible por derechos de autor o por acceso restringido. Contacte con la institución para más información.
| Tag | 1 | 2 | Valor |
|---|---|---|---|
| LDR | 00000cab a2200000 4500 | ||
| 001 | MAP20140031832 | ||
| 003 | MAP | ||
| 005 | 20140918165629.0 | ||
| 008 | 140915e20140901esp|||p |0|||b|spa d | ||
| 040 | $aMAP$bspa$dMAP | ||
| 084 | $a5 | ||
| 100 | 1 | $0MAPA20080104276$aKessler, Denis | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | $aWhy (Re)insurance is not systemic$cDenis Kessler |
| 520 | $aThe traditional model of (re)insurance lacks the elements that make a financial institution systemically important: risks are effectively pulverized; liabilities tend to be prefunded, which eliminates most of the leverage in the traditional sense; and active asset-liability management reduces most of the liquidity mismatch that traditionally propagates systemic risk. (Re)insurers that have stuck to this traditional business model have successfully weathered the crisis, even playing a stabilizing role. Unfortunately, this is not sufficiently recognized in the current IAIS-FSB debate on assessing systemic risk in the (re)insurance sector. | ||
| 650 | 4 | $0MAPA20080602529$aMercado de reaseguros | |
| 650 | 4 | $0MAPA20080591182$aGerencia de riesgos | |
| 650 | 4 | $0MAPA20100016923$aRiesgo sistémico | |
| 650 | 4 | $0MAPA20080610777$aEvolución del reaseguro | |
| 650 | 4 | $0MAPA20080611880$aPerspectivas del seguro | |
| 650 | 4 | $0MAPA20110024864$aModelos de negocio | |
| 650 | 4 | $0MAPA20110021238$aEstabilidad financiera | |
| 650 | 4 | $0MAPA20080627966$aControl de entidades financieras | |
| 650 | 4 | $0MAPA20080579814$aCrisis financiera | |
| 773 | 0 | $wMAP20077000727$tThe Journal of risk and insurance$dNueva York : The American Risk and Insurance Association, 1964-$x0022-4367$g01/09/2014 Volumen 81 Número 3 - septiembre 2014 , p. 477-488 |