Value of life and annuity demand
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
<record>
<leader>00000cab a2200000 4500</leader>
<controlfield tag="001">MAP20220014076</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="005">20220510164536.0</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="008">220510e20220509esp|||p |0|||b|spa d</controlfield>
<datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
<subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
<subfield code="d">MAP</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">341</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20220004947</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Pashchenko, Svetlana</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
<subfield code="a">Value of life and annuity demand</subfield>
<subfield code="c">Svetlana Pashchenko, Ponpoje Porapakkarm</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">How does the value of life affect annuity demand? To address this question, we construct a portfolio choice problem with three key features: (i) agents have access to life-contingent assets, (ii) they always prefer living to dying, (iii) agents have nonexpected utility preferences. We show that as utility from being alive increases, annuity demand decreases (increases) if agents are more (less) averse to risk rather than to intertemporal fluctuations. Put differently, if people prefer early resolution of uncertainty, they are less interested in annuities when the value of life is high. Our findings have two important implications. First, we get a better understanding of the well-known annuity puzzle. Second, we argue that the observed low annuity demand provides evidence that people prefer early rather than late resolution of uncertainty.
</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080573614</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Renta vitalicia</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080580377</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Esperanza de vida</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080584580</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Demanda de seguros</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20220004954</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Porapakkarm, Ponpoje</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="w">MAP20077000727</subfield>
<subfield code="g">09/05/2022 Volumen 89 Número 2 - mayo 2022 , p. 371-396</subfield>
<subfield code="x">0022-4367</subfield>
<subfield code="t">The Journal of risk and insurance</subfield>
<subfield code="d">Nueva York : The American Risk and Insurance Association, 1964-</subfield>
</datafield>
</record>
</collection>