The Effect of lifting protocol on comparisons with isoinertial lifting performance

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<rdf:Description>
<dc:creator>Stevenson, J.M.</dc:creator>
<dc:date>1990-12-01</dc:date>
<dc:description xml:lang="es">Sumario: The purpose of the study was threefold: (1) to determine if protocol constraints affected scores on a box-lifting task; (2) to identify any differences in impact of protocol changes on male and female scores; and (3) to determine if these protocol changes affected correlations between maximal box-lifting scores and maximal scores obtained on isoinertial lifting tests. It was concluded that the Incremental lifting machine (ILM) was unable to predict female lifting capabilities accurately using any of three protocols</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>https://documentacion.fundacionmapfre.org/documentacion/publico/es/bib/47429.do</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:rights xml:lang="es">InC - http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Ergonomía</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Biomecánica</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Fuerza muscular</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Trabajo físico</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Carga de materiales</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Protocolo</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Muestreos</dc:subject>
<dc:type xml:lang="es">Artículos y capítulos</dc:type>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">The Effect of lifting protocol on comparisons with isoinertial lifting performance</dc:title>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Título: Ergonomics</dc:title>
<dc:relation xml:lang="es">En: Ergonomics. - London and Washington. - Vol. 33, nº 12, December 1990 ; p. 1455-1469</dc:relation>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>