A Comparison between methods of measuring anaerobic work capacity

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071020646</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418120318.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">940718e19881001gbr||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">6800013651</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">875</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2">
      <subfield code="a">A Comparison between methods of measuring anaerobic work capacity</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">Lori J. Nebelsick-Gullett... [et al.]</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between anaerobic work capacity (AWC) and anaerobic capacity (AC) from the Critical Power (CP) and Wingate tests, respectively. A secondary purpose was to determine the reliability of AWC and CP. The results of this study indicated that de CP test was a valid and reliable technique for determining anaerobic capabilities as well as the maximal rate of fatigueless work</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080550653</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Ergonomía</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080570873</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Trabajo físico</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080575731</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Ejercicio físico</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080595036</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Capacidad de trabajo</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080595029</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Capacidad anaeróbica</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080562243</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Ergonometría</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080539948</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Tests</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080363123</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Nebelsick-Gullett, Lori J.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="740" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Ergonomics</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="t">Ergonomics</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">London [etc.]</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">Vol. 31, nº 10, October 1988 ; p. 1413-1419</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>