Most comfortable loudness shift as a measure of speech attenuation by hearing protectors

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071022860</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418120753.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">950629e19950401usa||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">872</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Most comfortable loudness shift as a measure of speech attenuation by hearing protectors</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">Tomasz letowski... [et al.]</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">The object of the study was to determine the most comfortable loudness (MCL) shifts for speech heard by listeners wearing HPDs in quiet. The authors deliberately used a quiet condition to determine whether MCL shift is sensitive enough to be a measure of HPD attenuation data obtained with the standardized real ear at the threshold (REAT) procedure. In addition, all three fitting procedures discussed above have been used in order to assess their effects on MCL determination</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080585679</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Higiene industrial</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080600488</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Contaminantes físicos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080539740</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Ruido</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080579746</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Control del ruido</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080603137</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Procesos industriales</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080564162</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Sensibilidad</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080551797</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Muestreos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080601492</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Estudios comparativos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080169428</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Letowski, Tomasz</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="740" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">American Industrial Hygiene Association journal</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="t">American Industrial Hygiene Association journal</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">Akron, Ohio</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">Vol. 56, nº 4, April 1995 ; p. 356-361</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>