Prevalence of back pain and characteristics of the physical workload of community nurses

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071025915</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418121316.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">960930e19960201gbr||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">875</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080047870</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Knibbe, J.J.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Prevalence of back pain and characteristics of the physical workload of community nurses</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">J.J. Knibbe and R.D. Friele</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">A research project is described that analyses the back pain prevalence and physical working conditions of community nurses. The purpose was to compare the position of nurses working in institutional care with the specific situation of nurses working in the private homes of their patients. The results of a queationnaire showed that the back pain prevalence was relatively high as compared to other occupations and also when compared to other health care sectors</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080550653</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Ergonomía</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080570873</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Trabajo físico</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080591717</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Lesiones musculares</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080579579</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Columna vertebral</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080554224</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Enfermeras</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080586713</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Personal sanitario</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080043421</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Friele, R.D.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="740" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Ergonomics</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="t">Ergonomics</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">London and Washington</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">Vol. 39, nº 2, February 1996 ; p. 186-198</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>