Shake up your thinking on catastrophe risk modeling : lessons learned from the Canterbury earthquakes
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-8.xsd">
<mods version="3.8">
<titleInfo>
<title>Shake up your thinking on catastrophe risk modeling</title>
<subTitle>: lessons learned from the Canterbury earthquakes</subTitle>
</titleInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
<originInfo>
<place>
<placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">esp</placeTerm>
</place>
<dateIssued encoding="marc">2014</dateIssued>
<issuance>serial</issuance>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">spa</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription>
<form authority="marcform">print</form>
</physicalDescription>
<abstract displayLabel="Summary">Catastrophe models are used by property & casualty (P&C) insurers for many reasons, such as estimating reinsurance needs, concentration analysis and pricing. These models have recently come to the forefront of thought in New Zealand due to the Canterbury earthquake events, which have stressed many reinsurance programs (government and private), and the introduction of a new regulation requiring insurers to hold reinsurance for one-in-1,000-year events. This article provides a background on recent events in New Zealand. It also describes why catastrophe models are relevant and useful, and what their shortcomings are universally applicable points</abstract>
<note type="statement of responsibility">by Craig Lough and Ron Kozlowski</note>
<subject xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080608088">
<topic>Programas de reaseguro</topic>
</subject>
<subject xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080612429">
<topic>Riesgos extraordinarios</topic>
</subject>
<subject xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080600204">
<topic>Catástrofes naturales</topic>
</subject>
<subject xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080611613">
<topic>Modelos probabílisticos</topic>
</subject>
<subject xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080604394">
<topic>Valoración de riesgos</topic>
</subject>
<subject xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080556792">
<topic>Terremotos</topic>
</subject>
<subject authority="lcshac" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20090005181">
<geographic>Nueva Zelanda</geographic>
</subject>
<classification authority="">5</classification>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Emphasis</title>
</titleInfo>
<originInfo>
<publisher>New York : Towers Watson, 1987-</publisher>
</originInfo>
<identifier type="local">MAP20077000932</identifier>
<part>
<text>02/07/2014 Número 2 - 2014 , p. 23-26</text>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<recordInfo>
<recordContentSource authority="marcorg">MAP</recordContentSource>
<recordCreationDate encoding="marc">140703</recordCreationDate>
<recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20140703131002.0</recordChangeDate>
<recordIdentifier source="MAP">MAP20140023400</recordIdentifier>
<languageOfCataloging>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">spa</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
</modsCollection>