Compulsory insurance : when it works and when it doesn't

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<rdf:Description>
<dc:creator>Insurance Europe</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2017</dc:date>
<dc:description xml:lang="es">[Insight Briefing]</dc:description>
<dc:description xml:lang="es">Sumario: For a developed society to function, individuals and businesses need access to appropriate, affordable insurance. Policymakers quite rightly want to ensure that this is possible, and it is often believed that compulsory insurance schemes are the best way to ensure the take-up or the availability of insurance, particularly for new risks. For example, the European Parliament recently put forward proposals for a mandatory insurance scheme for robots.It is important to understand that compulsory insurance schemes will only work if specific conditions are met. If they are not, an inappropriate scheme can do more harm than good.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>https://documentacion.fundacionmapfre.org/documentacion/publico/es/bib/162405.do</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:publisher>Insurance Europe</dc:publisher>
<dc:rights xml:lang="es">InC - http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Mercado de seguros</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Concentración de seguros</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Derecho comunitario</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Crecimiento económico</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Unión Europea</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Inteligencia artificial</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Prevención de riesgos</dc:subject>
<dc:type xml:lang="es">Livros</dc:type>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Compulsory insurance : when it works and when it doesn't</dc:title>
<dc:format xml:lang="es">2 p.</dc:format>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>