Risk appetite : taking and accepting the right amount of risk

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<rdf:Description>
<dc:creator>Protecht</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2022</dc:date>
<dc:description xml:lang="es">Sumario: The explicit reference to an organisational risk appetite has been around for a relatively short while. The concept of risk appetite, however, has implicitly been around forever. Like most aspects of risk management, there are the those that love risk appetite and those that loathe it and all those in between. These diverse views are healthy as they create intelligent debate. Regardless of the many risk expert arguments for and against risk appetite, the ultimate test must be: Does it add value? </dc:description>
<dc:description xml:lang="es">Sumario: Introduction -- Evolution of the Maturity Process -- What are the benefits of growing up -- What does growing up look like? -- Discrete levels of Maturity -- The steps in using a maturity model approach to developing your EBM</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>https://documentacion.fundacionmapfre.org/documentacion/publico/es/bib/179840.do</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:publisher>Protecht</dc:publisher>
<dc:rights xml:lang="es">InC - http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Gerencia de riesgos</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Apetito de riesgo</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Análisis de riesgos</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Evaluación de riesgos</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Identificación de riesgos</dc:subject>
<dc:type xml:lang="es">Livros</dc:type>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Risk appetite : taking and accepting the right amount of risk</dc:title>
<dc:format xml:lang="es">13 p.</dc:format>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>