Sustainability at a crossroads : July 2025

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<rdf:Description>
<dc:creator>ERM Group. The Sustainability Institute</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Globe Scan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Volans</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025</dc:date>
<dc:description xml:lang="es">En portada: Globe Scan, ERM sustainability institute, Volans</dc:description>
<dc:description xml:lang="es">Sumario: The report presents findings from a global survey of 844 experts across 72 countries, revealing that over 90% believe the current sustainability agenda needs revision, with more than half calling for radical change. Experts express declining trust in governments, NGOs, and global frameworks like the SDGs and Paris Agreement, while academic institutions gain credibility. The study identifies high-impact, feasible actions such as integrating sustainability into business strategies, advancing green finance, and implementing carbon pricing, alongside systemic interventions like circular economy models and mandatory due diligence. It also segments the sustainability community into four mindsetsTraditionalists, Institutionalists, Pathfinders, and Radicalshighlighting contrasting approaches to change. Despite political and economic disruptions and backlash against ESG, the report frames this moment as an opportunity for bold, collaborative action to accelerate a just, low-carbon, and nature-positive transition</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>https://documentacion.fundacionmapfre.org/documentacion/publico/es/bib/188875.do</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:publisher>Global Scan</dc:publisher>
<dc:rights xml:lang="es">InC - http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Estrategia empresarial</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Sostenibilidad</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Revisión</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Acuerdo de París</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Medición del impacto</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Control de emisiones</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Criterios ESG</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Inversiones socialmente responsables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Encuestas</dc:subject>
<dc:type xml:lang="es">Livros</dc:type>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Sustainability at a crossroads : July 2025</dc:title>
<dc:format xml:lang="es">40 p.</dc:format>
<dc:description xml:lang="es">Introduction & survey methodology -- The state of the sustainability agenda  fit for purpose? -- What should we do? Assessing potential impact vs. feasibility of different levers of change -- Different schools of thought a segmentation of the global sustainability community -- Appendix: Levers of change by change agent -- Government / Public Policy -- Investor / Capital Market -- Corporate / Business -- Civil Society</dc:description>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>