Response to atmospheric humidity at comfortable air temperature : a comparison of three experiments

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<rdf:Description>
<dc:creator>MacIntyre, Donald A.</dc:creator>
<dc:date>1978-08-01</dc:date>
<dc:description xml:lang="es">Sumario: Three experiments on subjective responses to atmospheric humidity at comfortable air temperatures are compared. Of the three experiments, the first two agreed in finding that both low and high humidities were rated as worse than the middle levels of 40-50%, on such scales as oppressiveness and stuffiness. Subjects also rated their skins as more moist in the more humid conditions. The third experiment failed to confirm these findings. The implications are discussed</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>https://documentacion.fundacionmapfre.org/documentacion/publico/es/bib/45490.do</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:rights xml:lang="es">InC - http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Ergonomía</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Contaminantes físicos</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Ambiente térmico</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Termometría</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Humedad</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Temperatura</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Confort térmico</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Contaminación atmosférica</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Condiciones de trabajo</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Ensayos</dc:subject>
<dc:type xml:lang="es">Artículos y capítulos</dc:type>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Response to atmospheric humidity at comfortable air temperature : a comparison of three experiments</dc:title>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Título: The Annals of occupational hygiene</dc:title>
<dc:relation xml:lang="es">En: The Annals of occupational hygiene. - Oxford [etc.]. - nº 2, August 1978 ; p. 177-190</dc:relation>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>