Do drug tests invade your privacy? : many employees consider pre-employment screening to be an ethical issue
Contenido multimedia no disponible por derechos de autor o por acceso restringido. Contacte con la institución para más información.
| Tag | 1 | 2 | Valor |
|---|---|---|---|
| LDR | 00000nab a2200000 i 4500 | ||
| 001 | MAP20071017322 | ||
| 003 | MAP | ||
| 005 | 20080418115018.0 | ||
| 007 | hzruuu---uuuu | ||
| 008 | 940217e19931201usa|||| | |00010|eng d | ||
| 040 | $aMAP$bspa | ||
| 084 | $a874 | ||
| 100 | 1 | $0MAPA20080011987$aHans, Mick | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | $aDo drug tests invade your privacy?$b: many employees consider pre-employment screening to be an ethical issue$cby Mick Hans |
| 520 | $aIn corporate America, the concept of drug testing in the workplace has come back with a Positive. Most people probably would rather sit though an unproductive meeting than fill a plastic cup. In the view of many large employers, however, the dollars and sense of discouraged drug use outweigh any invasion-of-personal-privacy questions. For controlled-substance users, the numbers are sobering. According to the Institute for a Drug-Free Workplace in Washington, D.C., more than 90 percent of about 2,000 major U.S. employers not required to administer testing conduct pre-employment screens anyway. Many employers also test under other conditions, such as after an on-the-job injury. In comparison, only 3 percent of Fortune 200 companies tested one or more classes of job applicants or employees in 1983 | ||
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080550653$aErgonomía |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080540821$aDrogas |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080588946$aAmbiente de trabajo |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080599744$aAccidentes de trabajo |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080614942$aPrevención de accidentes |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080576615$aMedicina laboral |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080568863$aEstados Unidos |
| 740 | 0 | $aSafety & health | |
| 773 | 0 | $tSafety & health$dItasca$gVol. 148, nº 6, December 1993 ; p. 34-38 |