Integrated displays and the perception of graphical data

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071019355</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418115757.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">940526e19910801gbr||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">6800013200</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">875</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080164140</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Goettl, Barry P.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Integrated displays and the perception of graphical data</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">Barry P. Goettl, Christopher D. Wickens and Arthur F. Kramer</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">This paper examines a number of aspects of the principle of compatibility of proximity in the domain of graphical perception of data. Experiment 1 tests the hypothesis that integral displays will be superior to separable displays when information must be integrated. Experiment 2 tests the hypothesis that when attention must be focused, a separable display will be better than a integral display. Experiment 3 investigates how displays are tied to the operator's internal representation of tasks</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080550653</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Ergonomía</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080612580</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Sistemas de información</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080559960</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Ordenadores</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080547462</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Gráficos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080550127</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Cognición</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080608637</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Sistema hombre-máquina</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080329365</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Wickens, Christopher D.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080197438</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Kramer, Arthur F.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="740" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Ergonomics</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="t">Ergonomics</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">London and Washington</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">Vol. 34, nº 8, August 1991 ; p. 1047-1063</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>