Pesquisa de referências

A Comparison between methods of measuring anaerobic work capacity

Fichero PDF / PDF file
Registro MARC
Tag12Valor
LDR  00000nab a2200000 i 4500
001  MAP20071020646
003  MAP
005  20080418120318.0
007  hzruuu---uuuu
008  940718e19881001gbr|||| | |00010|eng d
035  ‎$a‎6800013651
040  ‎$a‎MAP‎$b‎spa
084  ‎$a‎875
24512‎$a‎A Comparison between methods of measuring anaerobic work capacity‎$c‎Lori J. Nebelsick-Gullett... [et al.]
520  ‎$a‎The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between anaerobic work capacity (AWC) and anaerobic capacity (AC) from the Critical Power (CP) and Wingate tests, respectively. A secondary purpose was to determine the reliability of AWC and CP. The results of this study indicated that de CP test was a valid and reliable technique for determining anaerobic capabilities as well as the maximal rate of fatigueless work
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080550653‎$a‎Ergonomía
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080570873‎$a‎Trabajo físico
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080575731‎$a‎Ejercicio físico
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080595036‎$a‎Capacidad de trabajo
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080595029‎$a‎Capacidad anaeróbica
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080562243‎$a‎Ergonometría
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080539948‎$a‎Tests
7001 ‎$0‎MAPA20080363123‎$a‎Nebelsick-Gullett, Lori J.
7400 ‎$a‎Ergonomics
7730 ‎$t‎Ergonomics‎$d‎London [etc.]‎$g‎Vol. 31, nº 10, October 1988 ; p. 1413-1419