Will the Clean Water Act resurface?

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071022622</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418120729.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">950530e19950301usa||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">832.2</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080011987</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Hans, Mick</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Will the Clean Water Act resurface?</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">by Mick Hans</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">The federal Clean Water Act -designed to regulate water pollution in U.S. rivers and lakes- has roots in the environmental activism spurred by the first Earth Day in 1970. Just two years back, reauthorization of the Clean Water Act seemed one of the least controversial environmental issues. There's no hassle for the average citizen; the legislation contains no car-pool and waste-separation obligations to mess up an otherwise likeable concept. On the surface, the Clean Water Act (CWA) looked like one of those win-win issues in which most parties could find something to support</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080605230</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Contaminación del agua</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080574895</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Calidad del agua</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080621162</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Control de calidad del agua</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080538118</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Aguas</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080568863</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Estados Unidos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="740" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Safety & health</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="t">Safety & health</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">Itasca</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">Vol. 151, nº 3, March 1995 ; p. 72-75</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>