Pesquisa de referências

The Assigned protection factor of 10 for half-mask respirators

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071023201</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418120823.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">950911e19950701usa||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">871</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080201814</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Nelson, Thomas J.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4">
      <subfield code="a">The Assigned protection factor of 10 for half-mask respirators</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">Thomas J. Nelson</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">A number of researchers have published or presented papers on workplace protection factor (WPF) studies involving half-mask respirators. Individually, each study contains a relatively small amount of data, generally less than 25 data points for any single respirator. Because of the small amount of data, any attempt to quantify the result statistically does not provide useful information on the low end of the distribution of WPFs. Several studies on half-mask respirators were combined to yield a data set with 390 observations</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080629724</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Seguridad e higiene en el trabajo</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080628048</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Equipos de protección individual</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080559366</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Mascarillas</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080614942</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Prevención de accidentes</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080596569</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Evaluación higiénica</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080591960</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Métodos de análisis</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="740" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">American Industrial Hygiene Association journal</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="t">American Industrial Hygiene Association journal</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">Akron, Ohio</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">Vol. 56, nº 7, July 1995 ; p. 717-724</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>