Pesquisa de referências

The Elaboration likelihood model and communication about food risks

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071030418</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418122039.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">980623e19971201usa||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">80</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4">
      <subfield code="a">The Elaboration likelihood model and communication about food risks</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">Lynn J. Frewer... [et al.]</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Factors such as hazard type and source credibility have been identified as important in the establishment of effective strategies for risk communication. The elaboration likelihood model was adapted to investigate the potential impact of hazard type, information source, and persuasive content of information on individual engagement in elaborative, or thoughtful, cognitions about risk message. One hundred sixty respondents were allocated to one of eight experimental groups, and the effects of source credibility, persuasive content of information and hazard type were systematically varied. The impact of the different factors on beliefs about the information and elaborative processing examined. Low credibility was particularly important in reducing risk perceptions, although persuasive content and hazard type were also influential in determining whether elaborative processing occurred</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080609788</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Comunicación del riesgo</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080602871</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Percepción del riesgo</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080611613</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Modelos probabílisticos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080587673</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Riesgos higiénicos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080549541</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Alimentos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080131487</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Frewer, Lynn J.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="740" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Risk analysis</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="t">Risk analysis</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">New York and London</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">Vol. 17, nº 6, December 1997 ; p. 759-770</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>