Pesquisa de referências

Posture, discomfort and performance in a VDT task

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<rdf:Description>
<dc:creator>Liao, M.-H.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Drury, C. G.</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-03-01</dc:date>
<dc:description xml:lang="es">Improvements in workplace, working posture, and discomfort need to be justified in terms of improvements in performance. Previously, a visual inspection task has been investigated. The  objective of the current study was to demonstrate the interactions between workplace, work duration, discomfort, working posture, as well as performance in a 2-h typing task. The results indicate that the hypothesized posture-comfort-performance interrelationships were partially supported. Keyboard height had effects on working posture adopted. As in previous studies, the rate of postural shift was a good indication of discomfort in a VDT task. Discomfort and postural shift rate has adverse effects on performance (e.g. error rate). However, these effects on error rate not be strong.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>https://documentacion.fundacionmapfre.org/documentacion/publico/es/bib/53674.do</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:rights xml:lang="es">InC - http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Ergonomía</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Postura</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Teclados</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Confortabilidad</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Análisis de puestos de trabajo</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Posiciones de trabajo</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Pantallas de visualización de datos</dc:subject>
<dc:type xml:lang="es">Artículos y capítulos</dc:type>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Posture, discomfort and performance in a VDT task</dc:title>
<dc:relation xml:lang="es">En: Ergonomics. - London [etc.]. - Vol. 43 nº 3, March 2000 ; p. 345-359</dc:relation>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>