Absolute risk or relative risk? : a study of intraspecies and interspecies extrapolation of chemical-induced cancer risk

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<rdf:Description>
<dc:creator>Kuo, Jeanne</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2002-02-01</dc:date>
<dc:description xml:lang="es">The article has used the CBDS database of the National Toxicology Program to study the difference between absolute risk and relative risk model for interspecies and intersex preditions of cancer risk. For no combination of tumor and site is the prediction good for all chemicals. The variation in predicted risk between chemical exceeds the difference in risks resulting from applications of these two models. on the whole, it appears that relative risk is a better model</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>https://documentacion.fundacionmapfre.org/documentacion/publico/es/bib/55079.do</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:rights xml:lang="es">InC - http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Cáncer</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Riesgo personal</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Factores de riesgo</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Análisis de riesgos</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Evaluación de riesgos</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Valoración de riesgos</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Diagnóstico</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Casos prácticos</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Salud</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Gerencia de riesgos</dc:subject>
<dc:type xml:lang="es">Artículos y capítulos</dc:type>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Absolute risk or relative risk? : a study of intraspecies and interspecies extrapolation of chemical-induced cancer risk</dc:title>
<dc:relation xml:lang="es">En: Risk analysis : an international journal. - New York and London : Society for Risk Analysis. - Vol. 22, nº 1, February, 2002 ; p. 141-157</dc:relation>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>