Absolute risk or relative risk? : a study of intraspecies and interspecies extrapolation of chemical-induced cancer risk
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-8.xsd">
<mods version="3.8">
<titleInfo>
<title>Absolute risk or relative risk?</title>
<subTitle>: a study of intraspecies and interspecies extrapolation of chemical-induced cancer risk</subTitle>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080028145">
<namePart>Kuo, Jeanne</namePart>
<nameIdentifier>MAPA20080028145</nameIdentifier>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<originInfo>
<place>
<placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">usa</placeTerm>
</place>
<dateIssued encoding="marc">2002</dateIssued>
<issuance>serial</issuance>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription>
<form authority="marcform">print</form>
<form authority="marccategory">microform</form>
</physicalDescription>
<abstract>The article has used the CBDS database of the National Toxicology Program to study the difference between absolute risk and relative risk model for interspecies and intersex preditions of cancer risk. For no combination of tumor and site is the prediction good for all chemicals. The variation in predicted risk between chemical exceeds the difference in risks resulting from applications of these two models. on the whole, it appears that relative risk is a better model</abstract>
<note type="statement of responsibility">Jeanne Kuo... [et al]</note>
<subject authority="lcshac" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080540500">
<topic>Cáncer</topic>
</subject>
<subject authority="lcshac" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080573676">
<topic>Riesgo personal</topic>
</subject>
<subject authority="lcshac" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080585266">
<topic>Factores de riesgo</topic>
</subject>
<subject authority="lcshac" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080588953">
<topic>Análisis de riesgos</topic>
</subject>
<subject authority="lcshac" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080601522">
<topic>Evaluación de riesgos</topic>
</subject>
<subject authority="lcshac" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080604394">
<topic>Valoración de riesgos</topic>
</subject>
<subject authority="lcshac" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080557850">
<topic>Diagnóstico</topic>
</subject>
<subject authority="lcshac" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080571566">
<topic>Casos prácticos</topic>
</subject>
<subject authority="lcshac" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080539771">
<topic>Salud</topic>
</subject>
<subject authority="lcshac" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080591182">
<topic>Gerencia de riesgos</topic>
</subject>
<classification authority="">7</classification>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Risk analysis : an international journal</title>
</titleInfo>
<originInfo>
<publisher>New York and London : Society for Risk Analysis</publisher>
</originInfo>
<part>
<text>Vol. 22, nº 1, February, 2002 ; p. 141-157</text>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<recordInfo>
<recordContentSource authority="marcorg">MAP</recordContentSource>
<recordCreationDate encoding="marc">030114</recordCreationDate>
<recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20080418123650.0</recordChangeDate>
<recordIdentifier source="MAP">MAP20071503163</recordIdentifier>
<languageOfCataloging>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">spa</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
</modsCollection>