Absolute risk or relative risk? : a study of intraspecies and interspecies extrapolation of chemical-induced cancer risk

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071503163</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418123650.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">030114e20020201usa||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">7</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Absolute risk or relative risk?</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">: a study of intraspecies and interspecies extrapolation of chemical-induced cancer risk</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">Jeanne Kuo... [et al]</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1="8" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">The article has used the CBDS database of the National Toxicology Program to study the difference between absolute risk and relative risk model for interspecies and intersex preditions of cancer risk. For no combination of tumor and site is the prediction good for all chemicals. The variation in predicted risk between chemical exceeds the difference in risks resulting from applications of these two models. on the whole, it appears that relative risk is a better model</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080540500</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Cáncer</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080573676</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Riesgo personal</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080585266</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Factores de riesgo</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080588953</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Análisis de riesgos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080601522</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Evaluación de riesgos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080604394</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Valoración de riesgos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080557850</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Diagnóstico</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080571566</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Casos prácticos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080539771</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Salud</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080591182</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Gerencia de riesgos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080028145</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Kuo, Jeanne</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="g">Vol. 22, nº 1, February, 2002 ; p. 141-157</subfield>
      <subfield code="t">Risk analysis : an international journal</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">New York and London : Society for Risk Analysis</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>