Ethics and choosing appropiate means to an end : problems with coal mine and nuclear workplace safety

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071505223</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418124538.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">040504e20040201usa||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">871</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080365677</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Shrader-Frechette, Kristin</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Ethics and choosing appropiate means to an end</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">: problems with coal mine and nuclear workplace safety</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">Kristin Shrader-Frechette and Roger Cooke</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1="8" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Employers and employees may desire the safety end mandated by performance standards for pollution control, but they may fail to employ the means, specification standards, necesary to achieve this end. This article argues that current( de jure) performance standards, for lowering employee exposures to ionizing radiation, fail to promote "de facto" worker welfare, in part beaucuse employers and employees do not follow the neccesary means ( practices known as specifications standards)  to achieve the ends(performance standars) of workplace safety</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080564445</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Trabajadores</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080572884</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Minas de carbón</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080589509</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Centrales nucleares</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080605155</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Condiciones de trabajo</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080040628</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Cooke, Roger</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="740" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Risk analysis : an international journal</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="w">MAP20077000345</subfield>
      <subfield code="t">Risk analysis : an international journal</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">New York and London</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">February 2004 ; p. 147-156</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>