Five-State study of ACA marketplace competitions : a summary report

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000cab a2200000   4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20170034889</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20171103113139.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">171031e20170919esp|||p      |0|||b|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">MAP</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">344.1</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Five-State study of ACA marketplace competitions</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">: a summary report</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">Michael A. Morrisey... [et al.]</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">20 p.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">This field study sought to better understand the evolution of health insurance competition in the health insurance exchange marketplaces in five states: California, Michigan, Florida, North Carolina, and Texas. This summary highlights key findings from each of the states and offers a series of testable hypotheses about the evolution of these markets. Four broad themes emerged from the
analysis. First, health insurance markets are local, largely due to the necessity to establish local networks of health care providers. Second, higher than expected claims costs were the source of much of the turmoil in the marketplaces over the initial 4 years. Third, there has been a substantial shift toward narrower networks of providers, largely achieved by eliminating preferred provider plan
options. Fourth, hospital and physician competition is essential for a robust and competitive insurer market. </subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080573867</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Seguro de salud</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080626310</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Seguro de asistencia sanitaria</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080587901</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Seguro de personas</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080611880</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Perspectivas del seguro</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080638337</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Estados Unidos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20170014461</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Morrisey, Michael A.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="w">MAP20077001748</subfield>
      <subfield code="t">Risk management & insurance review</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">Malden, MA : The American Risk and Insurance Association by Blackwell Publishing, 1999-</subfield>
      <subfield code="x">1098-1616</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">19/09/2017 Tomo 20 Número 2 - 2017 , p. 153-172</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>