Why packages are a popular choice : where inhouse systems were once de rigeur for policy administration tasks, package software is now widely used and accepted. Steve Knight, editor of Wasp's...

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<rdf:Description>
<dc:date>1998</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>https://documentacion.fundacionmapfre.org/documentacion/publico/es/bib/82349.do</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>spa</dc:language>
<dc:rights xml:lang="es">InC - http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:type xml:lang="es">Artículos y capítulos</dc:type>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Why packages are a popular choice : where inhouse systems were once de rigeur for policy administration tasks, package software is now widely used and accepted. Steve Knight, editor of Wasp's Insurance Package Review, surveys the state of the market</dc:title>
<dc:relation xml:lang="es">En: Insurance & technology : the autority on insurance systems worldwide. - London : Insurance & Technology's Corporate = ISSN 1469-1299. - Número 5 14 1998</dc:relation>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>