How do employees prioritise when they schedule their own shifts?
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
<record>
<leader>00000cab a2200000 4500</leader>
<controlfield tag="001">MAP20130032603</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="005">20131008170707.0</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="008">131008e20130805esp|||p |0|||b|spa d</controlfield>
<datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
<subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
<subfield code="d">MAP</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">875</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
<subfield code="a">How do employees prioritise when they schedule their own shifts?</subfield>
<subfield code="c">Kirsten Nabe-Nielsen...[et.al]</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">We investigated how employees prioritised when they scheduled their own shifts and whether priorities depended on age, gender, educational level, cohabitation and health status. We used cross-sectional questionnaire data from the follow-up survey of an intervention study investigating the effect of self-scheduling (n = 317). Intervention group participants were asked about their priorities when scheduling their own shifts succeeded by 17 items covering family/private life, economy, job content, health and sleep. At least half of the participants reported that they were giving high priority to their family life, having consecutive time off, leisure-time activities, rest between shifts, sleep, regularity of their everyday life, health and that the work schedule balanced. Thus, employees consider both their own and the workplace's needs when they have the opportunity to schedule their own shifts. Age, gender, cohabitation and health status were all significantly associated with at least one of these priorities.</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="w">MAP20100019818</subfield>
<subfield code="t">Ergonomics : the international journal of research and practice in human factors and ergonomics</subfield>
<subfield code="d">Oxon [United Kingdom] : Taylor & Francis, 2010-</subfield>
<subfield code="x">0014-0139</subfield>
<subfield code="g">05/08/2013 Volumen 56 Número 8 - agosto 2013 , p. 1216-1224</subfield>
</datafield>
</record>
</collection>