Búsqueda

Decision-making and response strategies in interaction with alarms : the impact of alarm reliability, availability of alarm validity information and workload

Recurso electrónico / electronic resource
Registro MARC
Tag12Valor
LDR  00000cab a2200000 4500
001  MAP20140047291
003  MAP
005  20141216165955.0
008  141216e20141201esp|||p |0|||b|spa d
040  ‎$a‎MAP‎$b‎spa‎$d‎MAP
084  ‎$a‎875
1001 ‎$0‎MAPA20080170592‎$a‎Manzey, Dietrich
24510‎$a‎Decision-making and response strategies in interaction with alarms‎$b‎: the impact of alarm reliability, availability of alarm validity information and workload‎$c‎Dietrich Manzey, Nina Gérard, Rebecca Wiczorek
520  ‎$a‎Responding to alarm systems which usually commit a number of false alarms and/or misses involves decision-making under uncertainty. Four laboratory experiments including a total of 256 participants were conducted to gain comprehensive insight into humans' dealing with this uncertainty. Specifically, it was investigated how responses to alarms/non-alarms are affected by the predictive validities of these events, and to what extent response strategies depend on whether or not the validity of alarms/non-alarms can be cross-checked against other data. Among others, the results suggest that, without cross-check possibility (experiment 1), low levels of predictive validity of alarms ( = 0.5) led most participants to use one of two different strategies which both involved non-responding to a significant number of alarms (cry-wolf effect). Yet, providing access to alarm validity information reduced this effect dramatically (experiment 2). This latter result emerged independent of the effort needed for cross-checkings of alarms (experiment 3), but was affected by the workload imposed by concurrent tasks (experiment 4). Theoretical and practical consequences of these results for decision-making and response selection in interaction with alarm systems, as well as the design of effective alarm systems, are discussed.
7730 ‎$w‎MAP20100019818‎$t‎Ergonomics : the international journal of research and practice in human factors and ergonomics‎$d‎Oxon [United Kingdom] : Taylor & Francis, 2010-‎$x‎0014-0139‎$g‎01/12/2014 Volumen 57 Número 12 - diciembre 2014