Strategy and society : the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071508624</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418130003.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">070206e20061201usa||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">922.111</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080230104</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Porter, Michael E.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Strategy and society</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">Michael E. Porter and Mark R. Kramer</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1="8" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Many companies have already done much to improve the social and enviromental consequences of their activities, yet these efforts have not been nearly as productive as they could be, for two reasons. First, they pit business against society, when clearly the two are interdependent. Second, they pressure companies to think of corporate social responsibility in generic ways instead of int the way most appropriate to each firm's strategy </subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080555061</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Management</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080600938</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Dirección de empresas</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080610722</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Estrategia organizativa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080594312</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Ventaja competitiva</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080632090</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Responsabilidad social de la empresa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080137519</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Kramer, Mark R.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="740" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Harvard business review</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="w">MAP20077100345</subfield>
      <subfield code="t">Harvard business review</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">Boston</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">December 2006 ; p. 78-92</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>