A European nuclear accident pool
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
<record>
<leader>00000cab a2200000 4500</leader>
<controlfield tag="001">MAP20080021399</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="005">20091201135800.0</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="008">081119e20080401esp 00010 spa </controlfield>
<datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
<subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
<subfield code="d">MAP</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">328.3</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080056469</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Skogh, Göran</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2">
<subfield code="a">A European nuclear accident pool</subfield>
<subfield code="c">Göran Skogh</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">The compensation to victims of nuclear accidents is based on a Paris (OECD) and a Vienna (UN) convention. A problem with the system is that a strictly liable, but insolvent or uninsured plant owner leaves victims without compensation. In this paper, it is argued that a system could be better organised by, for example, the European Union (EU). A State that permits a nuclear reactor on its territory should be strictly liable. Benefits are: (i) States are able to compensate large damages; (ii) theory suggests that stepwise modified risk-sharing could be made beneficial for risk-averse States; (iii) the EU can enforce sharing agreements by Member States; (iv) a State can limit its financial burden by redressing some liability to the domestic nuclear industry. The incentive created hereby, as well as regulations on location and safety may prevent accidents. A European nuclear accident pool will have a collective interest in accident prevention</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080570491</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Riesgo nuclear</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080611187</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Instalaciones nucleares</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080614942</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Prevención de accidentes</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080636111</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Seguro de responsabilidad civil por riesgos nucleares</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080640255</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Unión Europea</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="w">MAP20077100215</subfield>
<subfield code="t">Geneva papers on risk and insurance : issues and practice</subfield>
<subfield code="d">Geneva : The Geneva Association, 1976-</subfield>
<subfield code="x">1018-5895</subfield>
<subfield code="g">01/04/2008 Tomo 33 Número 2 - 2008, p. 274-287</subfield>
</datafield>
</record>
</collection>