Best and worst of financial services brand building web sites, 2009 : insurers

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<rdf:Description>
<dc:creator>Rogowski, Ron</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Manning, Harley</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Zinser, Rachel</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Forrester</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009</dc:date>
<dc:description xml:lang="es">Sumario: The fiercely competitive insurance industry features some of the most esteemed brand names in the US, like Allstate Insurance, Progressive Casualty Insurance, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, and USAA. But how good are the brand experiences offered by major insurance Web sites? To find out, we graded the sites of four top brands on how well they communicate their Brand Image and deliver value to consumers (Brand Action). Only one site  Progressive  passed both of our brand tests. To improve the brand experience, insurers need to provide consistently placed links to quote engines streamline the quote process, and differentiate based on unique brand attributes </dc:description>
<dc:identifier>https://documentacion.fundacionmapfre.org/documentacion/publico/es/bib/116632.do</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:publisher>Forrester Research</dc:publisher>
<dc:rights xml:lang="es">InC - http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Servicios financieros</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Canales de distribución</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Internet</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Mercado de seguros</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Comercio electrónico</dc:subject>
<dc:type xml:lang="es">Books</dc:type>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Best and worst of financial services brand building web sites, 2009 : insurers</dc:title>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>