Defending the conception of "objective risk"

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<rdf:Description>
<dc:creator>Hermansson, Helene</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-02-01</dc:date>
<dc:description xml:lang="es">Sumario: The notion of "objective risk" is frequently discussed within the risk literature. While some argue that risk analysis measures objective risk, others claim that there are no real, objective risks - only subjective descriptions of them. "Objectivity" in these discussions of the presuposes value-free, dispassionate, and impartial analysis. Feminist epistemology offers a different interpretation of "objectivity" that is more context-bound. It is argued that even though every risk can be described in several different ways, and does involve value judgments and emotions, the objectivity ideal should not be abandoned</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>https://documentacion.fundacionmapfre.org/documentacion/publico/es/bib/136094.do</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>spa</dc:language>
<dc:rights xml:lang="es">InC - http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Análisis de riesgos</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Percepción del riesgo</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Riesgo objetivo</dc:subject>
<dc:type xml:lang="es">Artículos y capítulos</dc:type>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Defending the conception of "objective risk"</dc:title>
<dc:relation xml:lang="es">En: Risk analysis : an international journal. - McLean, Virginia : Society for Risk Analysis, 1987-2015 = ISSN 0272-4332. - 02/01/2012 Tomo 32 Número 1  - 2012 , p. 16-24</dc:relation>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>