Consumer insurance decisions : an empirical analysis of four real-world decisions
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
<record>
<leader>00000cam a2200000 i 4500</leader>
<controlfield tag="001">MAP20070029105</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="005">20090430174817.0</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="008">971111s1996 usa 00010 eng d</controlfield>
<datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
<subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
<subfield code="d">MAP</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">322</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080296759</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Austin, Laurel Cecelia</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
<subfield code="a">Consumer insurance decisions</subfield>
<subfield code="b">: an empirical analysis of four real-world decisions</subfield>
<subfield code="c">Laurel Cecelia Austin</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Ann Arbor, Michigan</subfield>
<subfield code="b">UMI</subfield>
<subfield code="c">1996</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">198 p.</subfield>
<subfield code="c">23 cm</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Tesis Carnegie Mellon Univ.</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">This thesis presents an empirical study of four different, but related, real-world automobile insurance decisions by 74 Pennsylvania drivers. Expected utility (EU) theory and innovation diffusion theory, two theories proposed as describing insurance decisions, were tested. Cognitive psychology methods were used to gather and examine verbal data, in order to compare subjects' mental models of the decision problems to those theoretical models. These methods minimized imposing researchers' views of the decision problem on subjects, something often unavoidable with other methodologies. Decisions examined were whether to buy optional collision coverage, choice of deductible, what liability limits to carry, and whether to take full or limited tort</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080603779</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Seguro de automóviles</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080584580</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Demanda de seguros</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080590802</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Estudios de mercado</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080597665</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Métodos estadísticos</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080431945</subfield>
<subfield code="a">UMI</subfield>
</datafield>
</record>
</collection>