Worth the risk

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000cab a2200000   4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20200028680</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20200922153449.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">200918e20200901gbr|||p      |0|||b|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">MAP</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">6</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20200018605</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Pang, Nicole </subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Worth the risk</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">Nicole Pang </subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">The broad nature of operational risk, as well as the lack of data available, means that operational risk modelling is an area of specific challenge for many firms. Given the lack of data, firms have resorted to modelling operational risk using a frequency severity model, relying on a scenario workshop process to set the underlying parameters based on expert judgment. However, in a world where we are constantly facing changes and significant external factors that are out of our control, is the current process sufficient for determining a firm's operational risk? Based on an insurance industry operational risk survey carried out in 2019, a third of firms had received regulatory feedback with respect to their operational risk models during the previous 12 months, and two-thirds were planning to make improvements to their operational risk models.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080587680</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Riesgos operativos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080592011</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Modelos actuariales</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080579258</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Cálculo actuarial</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080602437</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Matemática del seguro</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080591182</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Gerencia de riesgos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="w">MAP20200013259</subfield>
      <subfield code="t">The Actuary : the magazine of the Institute & Faculty of Actuaries</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">London :  Redactive Publishing, 2019-</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">01/09/2020 Número 8 - septiembre 2020 , p. 34-35</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>