Quantiles in a multi-stage nested classification credibility model

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000cab a2200000   4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20220013246</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20220504111529.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">220504e20201207esp|||p      |0|||b|spa d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">MAP</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">6</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20130010410</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Pitselis, Georgios</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Quantiles in a multi-stage nested classification credibility model</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">Georgios Pitselis</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">In insurance and finance it is often important to have a satisfactory estimate for an extreme quantile, like the one underlying capital requirements in Solvency II and Basel III. If credibility techniques on means are used for the determination of such quantiles, this can lead to quite unsatisfactory results, in particular in the presence of outliers in the data. Quantile credibility models themselves, however, cannot perform effectively when the set of data has a nested (hierarchical) structure. This paper develops multi-stage nested classification hierarchical credibility models for quantiles as an alternative to Jewell's (G Ist Ital Attuari 38:116, 1975) approach, where more than one risk factor divides the portfolio into different sectors or classes. We establish hierarchical quantile credibility estimators and illustrate their performance in two numerical illustrations.

</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20100014967</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Solvency II</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080602437</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Matemática del seguro</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="w">MAP20220007085</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">07/12/2020 Número 2 - diciembre 2020 , p. 399-423</subfield>
      <subfield code="t">European Actuarial Journal</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">Cham, Switzerland  : Springer Nature Switzerland AG,  2021-2022</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>