Search

All things considered : an analysis of IoT devices on home networks

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-8.xsd">
<mods version="3.8">
<titleInfo>
<title>All things considered</title>
<subTitle>: an analysis of IoT devices on home networks</subTitle>
</titleInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<originInfo>
<place>
<placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">usa</placeTerm>
</place>
<issuance>monographic</issuance>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Berkeley, California</placeTerm>
</place>
<publisher>Usenix</publisher>
<dateIssued>2019</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription>
<form authority="marcform">print</form>
<extent>18 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<abstract displayLabel="Summary">This paper provides the first large-scale empirical analysis of IoT devices in real-world homes by leveraging datacollected from user-initiated network scans of 83M devicesin 16M households. We find that IoT adoption is widespread: on several continents, more than half of households already have at least one IoT device. Device types and manufacturer popularity vary dramatically across regions. For example, while nearly half of North American homes have an Internet-connected television or streaming device, less than three percent do in South Asia here the majority of devices are surveillance cameras. We investigate the security posture of devices, detailing their open services, weak default credentials, and vulnerability to known attacks. Device security similarly varies geographically, even for specific manufacturers. For example, while less than 17% of TP-Link home routers in North America  have guessable passwords, nearly half do in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. We argue that IoT devices are here, but for most homes, the types of devices adopted are not the ones actively discussed</abstract>
<note type="statement of responsibility">Deepak Kumar... [et al.]</note>
<note>This paper is included in the Proceedings of the 28th USENIX Security Symposium, August 1416, 2019, Santa Clara, CA, USA</note>
<note>Internacional</note>
<subject xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20150010735">
<topic>Internet de las cosas</topic>
</subject>
<subject xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080552961">
<topic>Viviendas</topic>
</subject>
<subject xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080624972">
<topic>Seguro multirriesgo del hogar</topic>
</subject>
<subject xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20120007895">
<topic>Dispositivos móviles</topic>
</subject>
<subject xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080657543">
<topic>Dispositivos de rastreo</topic>
</subject>
<subject xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080604011">
<topic>Sistemas de seguridad</topic>
</subject>
<recordInfo>
<recordContentSource authority="marcorg">MAP</recordContentSource>
<recordCreationDate encoding="marc">221026</recordCreationDate>
<recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20221026100621.0</recordChangeDate>
<recordIdentifier source="MAP">MAP20220029575</recordIdentifier>
<languageOfCataloging>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">spa</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
</modsCollection>