Can occupational guidelines for work-rest schedules be based on endurance time data?

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071019319</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418115745.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">940523e19920301gbr||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">6800013164</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">875</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080305987</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Mathiassen, Svend Erik</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Can occupational guidelines for work-rest schedules be based on endurance time data?</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">S.E. Mathiassen and J. Winkel</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">The present communication discusses problems related to guidelines based on the Tlim-data for low-level, low-variation work activities. The considerations are mainly based on recent results from a number of independent Scandinavian research groups. Three main issues are addressed: prediction of Tlim by the Dul model; Tlim as a predictor of acute physiological status; and acute physiological status as a risk indicator for musculoskeletal disorders</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080550653</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Ergonomía</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080557348</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Biomecánica</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080591717</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Lesiones musculares</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080554392</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Fisiología</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080570484</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Riesgo laboral</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080586362</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Métodos de estudio</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080119874</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Winkel, Jorgen</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="740" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Ergonomics</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="t">Ergonomics</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">London and Washington</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">Vol. 35, nº 3, March 1992 ; p. 253-259</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>