Should we routinely test for simultaneous location and scale changes?

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<rdf:Description>
<dc:creator>Hutchinson, T.P.</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2002-02-01</dc:date>
<dc:description xml:lang="es">It is argued that in many circunstances, there is no compelling reason to believe that measurements from several experimental groups have the same variability. If it is plausible that the variabilities may differ, a statistical test sensitive to changes of scale as well as to changes of location should be selected. Some references to such test are given</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>https://documentacion.fundacionmapfre.org/documentacion/publico/es/bib/57933.do</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:rights xml:lang="es">InC - http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Métodos estadísticos</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:type xml:lang="es">Artículos y capítulos</dc:type>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Should we routinely test for simultaneous location and scale changes?</dc:title>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Título: Ergonomics</dc:title>
<dc:relation xml:lang="es">En: Ergonomics. - London and Washington. - Vol. 45, nº 3, February 2002 ; p. 248-251</dc:relation>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>