A Comparison of two physical ability tests for firefighters

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-8.xsd">
<mods version="3.8">
<titleInfo>
<nonSort xml:space="preserve">A  </nonSort>
<title>Comparison of two physical ability tests for firefighters</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal" usage="primary" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20130017594">
<namePart>Mamen, Asgeir</namePart>
<nameIdentifier>MAPA20130017594</nameIdentifier>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
<originInfo>
<place>
<placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">esp</placeTerm>
</place>
<dateIssued encoding="marc">2013</dateIssued>
<issuance>serial</issuance>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">spa</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription>
<form authority="marcform">print</form>
</physicalDescription>
<abstract displayLabel="Summary">Smoke diving is physically demanding, and firefighters must therefore meet certain minimum physical requirements. The aim of this study was to compare the physiological demands of two fire fitness tests: a test of 8-min treadmill walking approved by the Norwegian Labour Inspection Authority (NLIA) (a laboratory test) and a Canadian test consisting of 10 firefighting specific tasks carried out in sequence (an applied field test). If the Canadian field test is as physically demanding as the NLIA-approved laboratory test, it may be suitable for testing Norwegian firefighters. Twenty-two male professional firefighters were tested on separate days. In both tests, the subjects wore a complete firefighting outfit including a breathing apparatus. The test durations were 8 min (NLIA test) versus approximately 6 min (Canadian test). Neither the peak O2 uptake (VO2) of approximately 45 ml kg - 1 min - 1 nor the blood lactate concentration (BLC) at test termination (  9 mmol L - 1) differed between the two tests. Rating of perceived exertion (RPECR-10) was lower for the Canadian test than for the Norwegian test (5.2  ±  1.5 vs. 7.0  ±  2.0, respectively), and the exercise time at a high VO2 was also shorter. In conclusion, the Canadian test appeared to be almost as physically demanding as the NLIA-approved test, having equal peak VO2 and BLC, but shorter time at a high VO2 and shorter duration. It might thus be a suitable alternative to the NLIA test with some modifications. The advantage of the Canadian field test is the inclusion of specific firefighting-like tasks that are not part of the NLIA test.</abstract>
<note type="statement of responsibility">Asgeir Mamen, Harald Oseland, Jon Ingulf Medbø</note>
<classification authority="">875</classification>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Ergonomics : the international journal of research and practice in human factors and ergonomics</title>
</titleInfo>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Oxon [United Kingdom] : Taylor & Francis, 2010-</publisher>
</originInfo>
<identifier type="issn">0014-0139</identifier>
<identifier type="local">MAP20100019818</identifier>
<part>
<text>07/10/2013 Volumen 56 Número 10 - octubre 2013 </text>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<recordInfo>
<recordContentSource authority="marcorg">MAP</recordContentSource>
<recordCreationDate encoding="marc">131209</recordCreationDate>
<recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20131209105116.0</recordChangeDate>
<recordIdentifier source="MAP">MAP20130040738</recordIdentifier>
<languageOfCataloging>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">spa</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
</modsCollection>