Búsqueda

An Experimental analysis of modifications to the survivor benefit information within the Social Security statement

Recurso electrónico / Electronic resource
Registro MARC
Tag12Valor
LDR  00000cab a22000004b 4500
001  MAP20200003953
003  MAP
005  20220912093100.0
008  200211e2020 gbr|| p |0|||b|eng d
040  ‎$a‎MAP‎$b‎eng‎$d‎MAP
084  ‎$a‎40
1001 ‎$0‎MAPA20200002772‎$a‎Diebold, Jeffrey
24513‎$a‎An Experimental analysis of modifications to the survivor benefit information within the Social Security statement‎$c‎Jeffrey Diebold and Susan Camilleri
520  ‎$a‎The Social Security Statement is the primary resource most workers prefer to use to learn about their Social Security benfits. The Social Security Administration periodically mails this and supporting documents to all workers to help them make informed decisions about when to start receiving their benefits. Understandably, the Statement provides detailed information about the worker's retirement benefit. However, these documents contain remarkably little information about the survivor benefit despite the financial importance of this particular auxiliary benefit to the widows of deceased workers in widowhood. We analyze the effect of modifications to the survivor benefit information in the Statement on benefit knowledge and expected claiming behavior of married men using an experimental survey of workers. The results provide evidence that the augmentation of this information can temporarily improve benefit knowledge and influence expected claim ages.
650 4‎$0‎MAPA20080578107‎$a‎Seguridad Social
650 4‎$0‎MAPA20080606299‎$a‎Fuentes de información
650 4‎$0‎MAPA20080650193‎$a‎Información al cliente
650 4‎$0‎MAPA20080604714‎$a‎Análisis de resultados
650 4‎$0‎MAPA20080564445‎$a‎Trabajadores
650 4‎$0‎MAPA20080592332‎$a‎Pensión de viudedad
650 4‎$0‎MAPA20080572778‎$a‎Mejora continua
7001 ‎$0‎MAPA20200002789‎$a‎Camilleri, Susan
7102 ‎$0‎MAPA20200002796‎$a‎Cambridge University Press
7730 ‎$t‎Journal of Pension Economics & Finance.- London : Cambridge University Press ‎$g‎nº 19; January 2020, p. 21-48