Medicaid and long-term care : the effects of penalizing strategic asset transfers
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
<record>
<leader>00000cab a2200000 4500</leader>
<controlfield tag="001">MAP20210005626</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="005">20210219145132.0</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="008">210219e20210301usa|||p |0|||b|eng d</controlfield>
<datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
<subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
<subfield code="d">MAP</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">34</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20210003189</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Liu, Junhao </subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
<subfield code="a">Medicaid and long-term care</subfield>
<subfield code="b">: the effects of penalizing strategic asset transfers</subfield>
<subfield code="c">Junhao Liu, Anita Mukherjee</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Medicaid provides a critical source of insurance for long term care, and individuals may strategically offload assets (typically to children) to meet the means-tested eligibility requirement. In this article, we quantify the extent of such behavior using variation in the penalty for improper parent-to-child transfers induced by the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005. We estimate difference-indifferences models based on the hypothesis that only individuals with high levels of nursing home risk (high risk) will alter transfers because of the Act. We find that a 2-year horizon, high-risk individuals reduced transfers to children on the extensive margin by 11 percent and that the average total amount of transfers decreased by $4,860. The results hold only for coupled respondents. We also conduct a tripledifferences analysis to examine heterogeneity with financial literacy and find that even those with a low level of financial literacy responded to the penalty.</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080603786</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Seguro de dependencia</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080587901</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Seguro de personas</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080539344</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Niños</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080548100</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Medicaid</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080638337</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Estados Unidos</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080078904</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Mukherjee, A.</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="w">MAP20077000727</subfield>
<subfield code="t">The Journal of risk and insurance</subfield>
<subfield code="d">Nueva York : The American Risk and Insurance Association, 1964-</subfield>
<subfield code="x">0022-4367</subfield>
<subfield code="g">01/03/2021 Volumen 88 Número 1 - marzo 2021 , p. 53-77</subfield>
</datafield>
</record>
</collection>