Valuing health: Philosophical perspectives

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000cab a22000004u 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20260015026</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20260603180734.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">260305s2026    nld||||       ||| ||eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">MAP</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">931.2</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20260008547</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Norheim, Ole F.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Valuing health: Philosophical perspectives</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">Ole F. Norheim</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">This paper explores philosophical and ethical perspectives on valuing health, emphasizing its intrinsic and instrumental roles in wellbeing, productivity, and justice. It critiques the limitations of monetizing health benefits through benefitcost analysis and highlights alternative metrics like QALYs, DALYs, equivalent income, and WELLBYs. The author argues for integrating health into broader wellbeing measures and adopting lifetime perspectives in policy evaluation. Health should be recognized as a fundamental component of wellbeing, requiring methodological innovation and consensus on definitions to guide policies toward equity and sustainable progress.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="522" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Internacional</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080539771</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Salud</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080596095</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Economía de la salud</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080568771</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Envejecimiento</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20260008554</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Evaluación de políticas</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20260008561</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Bienestar social</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="w">MAP20210010194</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">13/04/2026 Volumen 34 - 2026 </subfield>
      <subfield code="t">The Journal of the economics of ageing </subfield>
      <subfield code="d">Oxford : Elsevier ScienceDirect, 2021-</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeoa.2026.100634</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>