Catastrophe risk financing in the United States and the European Union : a comparative analysis of alternative regulatory approaches
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
<record>
<leader>00000cab a2200000 4500</leader>
<controlfield tag="001">MAP20090089051</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="005">20091202161006.0</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="008">091005e20090901usa|| p |0|||b|eng d</controlfield>
<datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
<subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
<subfield code="d">MAP</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">328.1</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080168353</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Klein, Robert W.</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
<subfield code="a">Catastrophe risk financing in the United States and the European Union</subfield>
<subfield code="b">: a comparative analysis of alternative regulatory approaches</subfield>
<subfield code="c">Robert W. Klein, Shaun Wang</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">This article examines and compares regulatory and other government policies in the United States and the EU generally and their approaches to the financing of catastrophe risk specifically. It is important to understand the fundamental differences between the two systems to gain insights into their disparate treatment of catastrophe risk financing. Although policies could be improved in both jurisdictions, the authors argue that the much greater reform is needed in the United States relative to the EU regulatory policies that are being developed. They offer recommendations on how U.S. policies could be significantly improved as well as comment on issues facing the EU. They conclude with some observations on the needs for further progress in the U.S. and EU regulatory systems</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080591182</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Gerencia de riesgos</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080629755</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Seguro de riesgos extraordinarios</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080621391</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Financiación de los riesgos</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080570323</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Reglamentación</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080594589</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Análisis comparativo</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080608811</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Supervisión financiera</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080638337</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Estados Unidos</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080640255</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Unión Europea</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20090041691</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Wang, Shaun</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="w">MAP20077000727</subfield>
<subfield code="t">The Journal of risk and insurance</subfield>
<subfield code="d">Nueva York : The American Risk and Insurance Association, 1964-</subfield>
<subfield code="x">0022-4367</subfield>
<subfield code="g">01/09/2009 Tomo 76 Número 3 - 2009, p. 607-637</subfield>
</datafield>
</record>
</collection>