The Final Solvency II framework : will it be effective?

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-8.xsd">
<mods version="3.8">
<titleInfo>
<nonSort xml:space="preserve">The  </nonSort>
<title>Final Solvency II framework</title>
<subTitle>: will it be effective?</subTitle>
</titleInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
<originInfo>
<place>
<placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">che</placeTerm>
</place>
<dateIssued encoding="marc">2016</dateIssued>
<issuance>serial</issuance>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription>
<form authority="marcform">print</form>
</physicalDescription>
<abstract displayLabel="Summary">With Solvency II ready for implementation as per 2016, it is a good time to analyse the effectiveness of the framework. We build on earlier analyses of the preliminary framework dating from 2009. In the meantime many improvements have been implemented. We use 12 criteria to assess the effectiveness of Solvency II, and conclude that overall, Solvency II is effective. Not surprisingly, Solvency II is a major step ahead compared with the current supervisory framework. However, violations to some criteria remain. While some violations are because of simplifications, others are because of a lack of focus on particular risks (government bonds, inflation risk, liquidity risk). To resolve some of these violations, we propose specific prescribed and targeted stress tests through the own risk and solvency assessment and a more detailed focus on the effectiveness of governance structures.</abstract>
<note type="statement of responsibility">René Doff</note>
<subject xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080564254">
<topic>Solvencia II</topic>
</subject>
<subject xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080570736">
<topic>Sostenibilidad</topic>
</subject>
<subject xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080585563">
<topic>Gestión financiera</topic>
</subject>
<subject xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080606954">
<topic>Legislación de seguros</topic>
</subject>
<subject xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080608804">
<topic>Supervisión de seguros</topic>
</subject>
<subject xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080614041">
<topic>Evaluación de resultados</topic>
</subject>
<subject xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080536534">
<topic>ERM</topic>
</subject>
<subject xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080591182">
<topic>Gerencia de riesgos</topic>
</subject>
<classification authority="">218</classification>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Geneva papers on risk and insurance : issues and practice</title>
</titleInfo>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Geneva : The Geneva Association, 1976-</publisher>
</originInfo>
<identifier type="issn">1018-5895</identifier>
<identifier type="local">MAP20077100215</identifier>
<part>
<text>03/10/2016 Volumen 41 Número 4 - octubre 2016 , p. 587-607</text>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<recordInfo>
<recordContentSource authority="marcorg">MAP</recordContentSource>
<recordCreationDate encoding="marc">161222</recordCreationDate>
<recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20170117100314.0</recordChangeDate>
<recordIdentifier source="MAP">MAP20160038071</recordIdentifier>
<languageOfCataloging>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">spa</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
</modsCollection>