Pesquisa de referências

Digital due diligence : four questions to evaluate cyber insurance coverage

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<rdf:Description>
<dc:creator>White, Jennifer</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2017-03-01</dc:date>
<dc:description xml:lang="es">Sumario: With all the talk of the dangers of hacking and the importance of addressing the wide range of cyberrisks facing every organization, it is understandable that many have reached the point of cyber overload. Cyber and crime insurance policies have been so heavily recommended and purchased that many businesses are ready to move on once policies are placed. But the desire to just be done with it can cause a business to cut corners, which risks coverage, or allow unnecessary gaps in coverage, which risks the business. Ignoring the risk, or treating it as something that can be fully resolved, will only increase your company¿s exposure to potential loss. Therefore, it is important to consider the following four questions to make sure your cyber coverage is meeting your company¿s needs.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>https://documentacion.fundacionmapfre.org/documentacion/publico/es/bib/159709.do</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>spa</dc:language>
<dc:rights xml:lang="es">InC - http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Ciberriesgos</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Mercado de seguros</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Evaluación de riesgos</dc:subject>
<dc:type xml:lang="es">Artículos y capítulos</dc:type>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Digital due diligence : four questions to evaluate cyber insurance coverage</dc:title>
<dc:relation xml:lang="es">En: Risk Management Magazine. - New York : Risk and Insurance Management Society, 1982- = ISSN 0035-5593. - 01/03/2017 Volumen 64 Número 2 - marzo 2017 , p. 30-34</dc:relation>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>