Strategies and tactics in fault diagnosis

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071020593</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418120303.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">940720e19880501gbr||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">6800012720</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">875</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080226893</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Morrison, David L.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Strategies and tactics in fault diagnosis</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">David L. Morrison and Keith D. Duncan</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Large individual differences in the ability to diagnose novel system failures are often noted in the research literature. Recent evidence suggest that measures of reflective cognitive styles may be good predictors of fault diagnosis performance. In this paper two experiments are described that are concerned with the development, identification and prediction of effective strategies amongst novice problems solvers</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080550653</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Ergonomía</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080583514</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Análisis de fallos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080562250</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Error humano</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080606091</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Estrategia empresarial</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080550127</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Cognición</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080607289</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Métodos experimentales</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080161071</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Duncan, Keith D.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="711" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080487874</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">International Ergonomics Association</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">1988</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">Sydney</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="740" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Ergonomics</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="t">Ergonomics</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">London [etc.]</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">Vol. 31, nº 5, May 1988 ; p. 761-784</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>