Is now the time for tort reform?

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071506969</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418125325.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">050706e20050401usa||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">7</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080225872</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">McCabe, Michael J.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Is now the time for tort reform?</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">Michael J. McCabe</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1="8" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">In public affairs, as in sports and business, timing is critical. And many observes believe the time is right in 2005 for tort reform in America. Conventional wisdom cites the increased power of Republicans in Congress as the main reform measures. Legitimate and lasting solutions must come from a consensus that is grounded in broad political and public support. That is why two other key factors besides election results will affect the fate of tort reform efforts this year</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080627638</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Seguro de responsabilidad civil</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080629632</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Responsabilidad civil profesional</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080582302</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Reforma sanitaria</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080568863</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Estados Unidos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080547981</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Litigios</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="t">Risk management </subfield>
      <subfield code="d">New York</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">Vol. 52, nº 4, April 2005 ; p. 40-46</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>