Búsqueda

A Critical analysis of the Solvency II proposals

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000cab a2200000   4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20080021337</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20091201135723.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">080911e20080401esp|||p      |0|||b|spa d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">MAP</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">22</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080646752</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Doff, René</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2">
      <subfield code="a">A Critical analysis of the Solvency II proposals</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">René Doff</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">The European Commission has recently published the Solvency II proposals with the objective to fundamentally review the insurance supervisory framework. We test the Solvency II framework against seven criteria developed by Cummins et al. describing how best to duplicate the operation of an efficient and complete market. Solvency II satisfies most of these criteria. In this way, Pillar II/III will resolve some of the problems in Pillar I, such as inappropriate incentives of the capital requirements formulae (hard solvency capital requirement limit, modular minimum capital requirement). Areas for further work on Pillars II and III are operational and business risk, long-term effects of strategic decision-making</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080564254</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Solvencia II</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080584351</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Control de seguros</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080591182</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Gerencia de riesgos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080586294</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Mercado de seguros</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="w">MAP20077100215</subfield>
      <subfield code="t">Geneva papers on risk and insurance : issues and practice</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">Geneva : The Geneva Association, 1976-</subfield>
      <subfield code="x">1018-5895</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">01/04/2008 Tomo 33 Número 2  - 2008, p. 193-206</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>