| LDR | | | 00000cab a2200000 4500 |
| 001 | | | MAP20150020130 |
| 003 | | | MAP |
| 005 | | | 20150605150916.0 |
| 008 | | | 150529e20150302esp|||p |0|||b|spa d |
| 040 | | | $aMAP$bspa$dMAP |
| 084 | | | $a7 |
| 100 | 1 | | $0MAPA20150011527$aDoorn, Neelke |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | $aThe Blind spot in risk ethics$b: managing natural hazards$cNeelke Doorn |
| 520 | | | $aMany risk scholars recognize the importance of including ethical considerations in risk management. Risk ethics can provide in-depth ethical analysis so that ethical considerations can be part of risk-related decisions, rather than an afterthought to those decisions. In this article, I present a brief sketch of the field of risk ethics. I argue that risk ethics has a bias toward technological hazards, thereby overlooking the risks that stem from natural and semi-natural hazards. In order to make a contribution to the field of risk research, risks ethics should broaden its scope to include natural and semi-natural hazards and develop normative distribution criteria that can support decision making on such hazards. |
| 773 | 0 | | $wMAP20077000345$tRisk analysis : an international journal$dMcLean, Virginia : Society for Risk Analysis, 1987-2015$x0272-4332$g02/03/2015 Volumen 35 Número 3 - marzo 2015 |
| 856 | | | $yMÁS INFORMACIÓN$umailto:centrodocumentacion@fundacionmapfre.org?subject=Consulta%20de%20una%20publicaci%C3%B3n%20&body=Necesito%20m%C3%A1s%20informaci%C3%B3n%20sobre%20este%20documento%3A%20%0A%0A%5Banote%20aqu%C3%AD%20el%20titulo%20completo%20del%20documento%20del%20que%20desea%20informaci%C3%B3n%20y%20nos%20pondremos%20en%20contacto%20con%20usted%5D%20%0A%0AGracias%20%0A |
