The Paradox of bureaucratic risk control

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071501494</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418122828.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">010117e20000201gbr||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">871</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080003289</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Bax, Erik</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4">
      <subfield code="a">The Paradox of bureaucratic risk control</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">by Erik Bax</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1="8" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Rules clearly play an integral role in maintaining the safety of an industrial workplace; but are formal rules and procedures effective in all dangerous situations? Do workers have to choose between production targets and safety? In every organization there are three main tipes of hidden rules: colleagues tend to protect each other to make impossible for management to discover the causes of an incident in case of drafting; it is not considered very wise to unplease ones superior; and, related to safety itself, rules considered useless and senseless are violated but there's still the concern of work danger, so employees have their own informal rules to guarantee each others' safety</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080629724</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Seguridad e higiene en el trabajo</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080566968</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Productividad</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080592165</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Normas de seguridad</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080595753</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Cultura organizativa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080598938</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Seguridad industrial</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080610968</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Gestión de la seguridad</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080459970</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Risk and Insurance Management Society</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="d">New York : The Risk and Insurance Management Society</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">Vol. 47, nº 2 February 2000; p. 19-22</subfield>
      <subfield code="t">Risk Management</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>