Búsqueda

Cash-balance plan conversions : evidence on excise taxes and implicit contracts

Fichero PDF / PDF file
Registro MARC
Tag12Valor
LDR  00000nab a2200000 i 4500
001  MAP20071506980
003  MAP
005  20080418125327.0
007  hzruuu---uuuu
008  050711e20050601usa|||| | |00010|eng d
040  ‎$a‎MAP‎$b‎spa
084  ‎$a‎345
1001 ‎$0‎MAPA20080079420‎$a‎Niehaus, Greg
24510‎$a‎Cash-balance plan conversions : evidence on excise taxes and implicit contracts‎$c‎Greg Niehaus, Tong Yu
5208 ‎$a‎Firms that wish to switch from a traditional defined-benefit pension plan to a defined-contribution-type plan have a choice between coverting to a cash-balance plan or replacing the defined-benefit plan with a full-fledged defined-contribution plan. According to Ippolito and Thompson's (1999; industrial relations, 39 : 228-245) excise tax avoidance hypothesis, a number of firms have switched to cash-balance plans because conversion allows the firm to avoid excise taxes on its excess pension assets. In contrast to existing studies, our evidence supports the excise tax avoidance hypothesis
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080552114‎$a‎Pensiones
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080592455‎$a‎Planes de pensiones
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080639389‎$a‎Balances
65001‎$0‎MAPA20080562342‎$a‎Estadísticas
7001 ‎$0‎MAPA20080002916‎$a‎Yu, Tong
7404 ‎$a‎The Journal of risk and insurance
7730 ‎$t‎The Journal of risk and insurance‎$d‎Orlando‎$g‎Volume 72, number 2, June 2005 ; p. 321-352